Capacity & Performance

Baseline standard for capacity planning and performance baselines across web, database, and LMS systems.

Operations Runbook standard Test → Abnahme → Prod Rollback mitdenken

Quick overview

This page describes the working standard for Capacity & Performance – with a focus on concrete decisions rather than general guidance.

The main focus here is which kpis as performance-goal apply and when skaliert or optimiert becomes so that teams apply the same standard.

The standard only becomes traceable through linked evidence such as messreihen / dashboards and through documented edge cases/exceptions.

Practical focusTopic-specificVerifiable

When this page helps

Typical situations in which this page adds value as a working document, and where another document is more appropriate.

Typical use cases

when for Capacity & Performance technical standards about lastprofile, bottlenecks and baselines must be documented in a binding way
when team handovers or temporary cover the same process for which kpis as performance-goal apply should be able to execute safely
when incidents or Changes show that evidence such as messreihen / dashboards are still missing
when configuration or operational deviations (e.g. only infrastrukturwerte instead of user-sicht gemessen) occur repeatedly

Less suitable when

when Capacity & Performance only about a one-off individual case without need for standardization applies
when a detailed project ticket or a technical step-by-step guide is the better fit

Recommended process

A pragmatic sequence that works in practice, from scope to review.

capture the current state and scope for Capacity & Performance capture, including lastprofile, bottlenecks and baselines and critical dependencies.
define the target state and standards; key decisions include which kpis as performance-goal apply.
test changes in a controlled way (Staging, Testsystem or Checklist) and Ergebnis document.
implement in production, run follow-up checks, and messreihen / dashboards + benchmarkprotokolle link.
Monitoring/Reviews auswerten and recurring Befunde such as „only Infrastrukturwerte instead of User-Sicht gemessen“ in the standard einarbeiten.

Decision rules

Note: Gemeinsame documentation-Standards stehen in the guideline. This page keeps only fest, was for Capacity & Performance functional or technisch entschieden was. Central guideline.

Capacity & Performance is well documented, when rules, Edge cases and Evidence so clearly are, dass teams so that without additional coordination work can.

Entscheidungsrahmen

For Capacity & Performance first define the scope clearly: Lastprofile, bottlenecks and Baselines.

responsibility

decisions about which kpis as performance-goal apply and when skaliert or optimiert becomes not implizit lassen, sondern roles and approvals explicitly benennen.

Abweichungsregeln

Allow exceptions only if they do not dilute the standard; especially relevant here are systemparameter and caching.

review triggers

Verifiable is the rule only, when messreihen / dashboards and benchmarkprotokolle cleanly verlinkt are.

What should be documented

Here only the spezifischen Inhalte about Capacity & Performance maintain; general documentation rules remain in the centraln guideline. Central guideline.

The page is good when a substitute can apply or review the standard without first collecting tribal knowledge.

Kontext

terms, scope and boundaries about Capacity & Performance specify in concrete terms, including lastprofile, bottlenecks and baselines.

Umsetzungsvorgaben

Den standard so record, dass which kpis as performance-goal apply and which tests lastspitzen abdecken eindeutig entschieden are.

review path

Name and link evidence directly: Messreihen / Dashboards, Benchmarkprotokolle, Optimierungs-Changes.

Offene Punkte / Exceptions

Aktive Exceptions, the latest change and the next review belong on the page—especially for topics with systemparameter and caching.

Common pitfalls

This section captures real-world pitfalls from Capacity & Performance; general guidance belongs in the central guideline. Central guideline.

scope driftet: only Infrastrukturwerte instead of User-Sicht gemessen.
the rule is too abstract: Baseline is missing primarily Optimierung.
evidence is missing: Peak-Zeiten be not getestet.
the exception gets out of control: Ist-Stand is only on systemsn documented.

Tip: It is better to document three concrete observations from real cases than to keep a long generic list.

Review & maintenance

Check this Page gegen reale processes about Capacity & Performance – not only gegen the Wortlaut. Entscheidend is, ob standard, Exceptions and Evidence in the Alltag contribute.

Passen Ziele about real Lastmustern?
Were changes gemessen verglichen?
Gibt it new bottlenecks?
Passt the process still to the Systemlandschaft?

Review focus for „Capacity & Performance“: Performance; check especially lastprofile, bottlenecks and baselines.

Useful metrics

A few metrics are enough – what matters is that they trigger decisions or improvements.

For „Capacity & Performance“ Kennzahlen directly an which kpis as performance-goal apply and the most frequent Praxisrisiken koppeln.

P95 Antwortzeit

Antwortzeit in kritischen Nutzungsfenstern

Interval: monthly

Peak-Auslastung

Auslastung in Lastspitzen pro Ressource

Interval: monthly

Performance-Incidents

incidents with Performance-Bezug

Interval: monthly

Next steps

Add jetzt the concrete Entscheidung about which kpis as performance-goal apply incl. Verantwortlichen, Datum and Verweis on messreihen / dashboards.

On „Capacity & Performance“ make especially clear as the next step: which lastprofile, bottlenecks and baselines apply in the standard case and which exceptions are time-limited.